CostPerGen

Pika 2.2 is cheaper: $0.04 vs $0.05 per second of 720p video on each model's cheapest path — 1.3× less. For 60 seconds of 720p video: $2.40 vs $3.00. Stamped 2026-08-28. Luma Ray 2's premium may buy quality — this index measures cost only.

Luma Ray 2 vs Pika 2.2: price

Luma Ray 2

$0.05–$0.10 per second of 720p video

Cheapest: $0.05 via fal.ai (Ray 2 Flash) (derived)

Pika 2.2

$0.04 per second of 720p video

Cheapest: $0.04 via fal.ai (derived)

How much does Luma Ray 2 cost?

ProviderPrice /sec (720p)Provider's own unitStatusSource
fal.ai$0.10$0.50 per 5s clip (720p)USD per clipDerived2026-08-28source
fal.ai · Ray 2 Flashcheapest$0.05$0.25 per 5s clipUSD per clipDerived2026-08-28source
Lumacredit tiers (account required)credit tiers (account required)creditsHiddensource
How these numbers were computed

How much does Pika 2.2 cost?

ProviderPrice /sec (720p)Provider's own unitStatusSource
fal.aicheapest$0.04$0.20 per video (5s)USD per clipDerived2026-08-28source
Pikasubscription credits onlysubscription credits onlycreditsHiddensource
How these numbers were computed

Frequently asked

Is Luma Ray 2 cheaper than Pika 2.2?

Pika 2.2 is cheaper: $0.04 vs $0.05 per second of 720p video on each model's cheapest path — 1.3× less. For 60 seconds of 720p video: $2.40 vs $3.00. Stamped 2026-08-28. Luma Ray 2's premium may buy quality — this index measures cost only.

What does 60 seconds of 720p video cost on each?

Luma Ray 2: $3.00 (cheapest path). Pika 2.2: $2.40. Both computed from the normalized canonical rate; real invoices vary with resolution, minimum charges, and tiers.

Which is better quality?

This index measures cost, not quality. For quality benchmarks, see Artificial Analysis — a video model that costs more is not automatically better, and vice versa.

Prices normalized to per second of 720p video; per-clip, credit, and tier billing converted per themethodology. Quality comparison is out of scope — seeArtificial Analysis.