Z-Image Turbo is cheaper: $0.0030 vs $0.012 per image at 1024×1024 on each model's cheapest path — 4.0× less. For 1,000 images (1024×1024): $3.00 vs $12.00. Stamped 2026-09-07. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B's premium may buy quality — this index measures cost only.
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B vs Z-Image Turbo: price
How much does FLUX.2 [klein] 9B cost?
| Provider | Price /image (1024²) | Provider's own unit | vs official | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black Forest Labs | $0.015 | $0.015 first megapixel + $0.002 each additional MPUSD per megapixel | — | Verified2026-09-07 | source |
| fal.aicheapest | $0.012 | $0.012 per megapixelUSD per megapixel (1024×1024 ≈ 1 MP) | -20% | Derived2026-09-07 | source |
How these numbers were computed
- fal.ai: fal.ai per-megapixel rate captured in the FairStack operational cost audit, 2026-03-23 (price-audit-full.json) (listed $0.011/MP); endpoint flux-2-klein-9b. 1024×1024 bills as 1 MP.
How much does Z-Image Turbo cost?
| Provider | Price /image (1024²) | Provider's own unit | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fal.aicheapest | $0.0030 | $0.003 per megapixelUSD per megapixel (1024×1024 ≈ 1 MP) | Derived2026-09-07 | source |
How these numbers were computed
- fal.ai: fal.ai per-megapixel rate captured in the FairStack operational cost audit, 2026-03-23 (price-audit-full.json) (listed $0.003/MP); endpoint z-image-turbo. 1024×1024 bills as 1 MP.
Frequently asked
Is FLUX.2 [klein] 9B cheaper than Z-Image Turbo?
Z-Image Turbo is cheaper: $0.0030 vs $0.012 per image at 1024×1024 on each model's cheapest path — 4.0× less. For 1,000 images (1024×1024): $3.00 vs $12.00. Stamped 2026-09-07. FLUX.2 [klein] 9B's premium may buy quality — this index measures cost only.
What does 1,000 images (1024×1024) cost on each?
FLUX.2 [klein] 9B: $12.00 (cheapest path). Z-Image Turbo: $3.00. Both computed from the normalized canonical rate; real invoices vary with resolution, minimum charges, and tiers.
Which is better quality?
This index measures cost, not quality. For quality benchmarks, see Artificial Analysis — a image model that costs more is not automatically better, and vice versa.
Prices normalized to per image at 1024×1024; per-clip, credit, and tier billing converted per themethodology. Quality comparison is out of scope — seeArtificial Analysis.